The Impact of Teaching on Students Essay -- English Writing Teacher St

A number of people whom I have heard recount their former school days with an overall sense of calm or detachment have been moved to more intensity when speaking of their experiences with writing. Their stories either enthusiastically celebrate the encouragement and praise offered by teachers who facilitated their self-confidence and pride, or are miserable tales that depict feelings of humiliation, disappointment and failure. A closer look at these two extremes is imperative as we consider teaching writing and the impact of that teaching on the students. While listening to recollections of English classes, I have found that it is not unusual for the stories of a single individual to weigh as heavily in one direction as the other. One of the reasons I feel strongly about this issue is that it mirrors my own experiences as a returning student. Like the others with whom I’ve spoken, I have been applauded by some teachers and judged harshly by others. Comments on my papers have ranged from, â€Å"An outstanding essay. I enjoyed reading it immensely,† and â€Å"This is one of the best papers I’ve gotten in years. I shared it with a colleague of mine,† to â€Å"Who ever taught you how to write?† and â€Å"What? What? Cut, cut, cut. So wordy. Not more backfill!† A simple explanation might be that disparaging comments were directed at early writing and praise at later work, but that is not the case. What then can be the reason? Inconsistent work, of course, or perhaps the incongruity can be explained by the subjectivity inherent in the judgment of writing, particularly when contrasted with a more systematic assessment tool like multiple choice tests (there is subjectivity even in these, as regards wording and interpretation of the questions, but that is ... ...ucating Other People’s Children.† Cross-Talk in Comp Theory: A Reader. Ed. Victor Villanueva, Jr. Urbana, IL: NCTE, 1997. Elbow, Peter. Writing Without Teachers. London: Oxford University Press, 1973. Emig, Janet. â€Å"Writing as a Mode of Learning.† Cross-Talk in Comp Theory: A Reader. Ed. Victor Villanueva, Jr. Urbana, IL: NCTE, 1997. Murray, Donald M. â€Å"Writing as Process: How Writing Finds Its Own Meaning.† Learning By Teaching. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann, 1982. 17-31. Originally published in Timothy R. Donovan and Ben W. McClelland, eds. Eight Approaches to Teaching Writing. Urbana, IL: NCTE, 1980. Perl, Sondra. â€Å"Understanding Composing.† College Composition and Communications 31 (1980): 363-369. Reprinted in Gary Tate, Edward P. J. Corbett and Nancy Myers, eds. The Writing Teacher’s Sourcebook, 3rd edition. New York: Oxford University Press, 1994. 149-154. The Impact of Teaching on Students Essay -- English Writing Teacher St A number of people whom I have heard recount their former school days with an overall sense of calm or detachment have been moved to more intensity when speaking of their experiences with writing. Their stories either enthusiastically celebrate the encouragement and praise offered by teachers who facilitated their self-confidence and pride, or are miserable tales that depict feelings of humiliation, disappointment and failure. A closer look at these two extremes is imperative as we consider teaching writing and the impact of that teaching on the students. While listening to recollections of English classes, I have found that it is not unusual for the stories of a single individual to weigh as heavily in one direction as the other. One of the reasons I feel strongly about this issue is that it mirrors my own experiences as a returning student. Like the others with whom I’ve spoken, I have been applauded by some teachers and judged harshly by others. Comments on my papers have ranged from, â€Å"An outstanding essay. I enjoyed reading it immensely,† and â€Å"This is one of the best papers I’ve gotten in years. I shared it with a colleague of mine,† to â€Å"Who ever taught you how to write?† and â€Å"What? What? Cut, cut, cut. So wordy. Not more backfill!† A simple explanation might be that disparaging comments were directed at early writing and praise at later work, but that is not the case. What then can be the reason? Inconsistent work, of course, or perhaps the incongruity can be explained by the subjectivity inherent in the judgment of writing, particularly when contrasted with a more systematic assessment tool like multiple choice tests (there is subjectivity even in these, as regards wording and interpretation of the questions, but that is ... ...ucating Other People’s Children.† Cross-Talk in Comp Theory: A Reader. Ed. Victor Villanueva, Jr. Urbana, IL: NCTE, 1997. Elbow, Peter. Writing Without Teachers. London: Oxford University Press, 1973. Emig, Janet. â€Å"Writing as a Mode of Learning.† Cross-Talk in Comp Theory: A Reader. Ed. Victor Villanueva, Jr. Urbana, IL: NCTE, 1997. Murray, Donald M. â€Å"Writing as Process: How Writing Finds Its Own Meaning.† Learning By Teaching. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann, 1982. 17-31. Originally published in Timothy R. Donovan and Ben W. McClelland, eds. Eight Approaches to Teaching Writing. Urbana, IL: NCTE, 1980. Perl, Sondra. â€Å"Understanding Composing.† College Composition and Communications 31 (1980): 363-369. Reprinted in Gary Tate, Edward P. J. Corbett and Nancy Myers, eds. The Writing Teacher’s Sourcebook, 3rd edition. New York: Oxford University Press, 1994. 149-154.

Greek Mythology and Religion :: Ancient Greece Greek History

Greek Mythology and Religion Mythology is the study and interpretation of myth and the body of myths of a particular culture. Myth is a complex cultural phenomenon that can be approached from a number of viewpoints. In general, myth is a narrative that describes and portrays in symbolic language the origin of the basic elements and assumptions of a culture. Mythic narrative relates, for example, how the world began, how humans and animals were created, and how certain customs, gestures, or forms of human activities originated. Almost all cultures possess or at one time possessed and lived in terms of myths. Myths differ from fairy tales in that they refer to a time that is different from ordinary. The time sequence of myth is extraordinary- an "other" time - the time before the conventional world came into being. Because myths refer to an extraordinary time and place and to gods and other supernatural beings and processes, they have usually been seen as aspects of religion. Because of the inclusive nature of myth, however, it can illustrate many aspects of individual and cultural life. Meaning and interpretation From the beginnings of Western culture, myth has presented a problem of meaning and interpretation, and a history of controversy has gathered about both the value and the status of mythology. Myth, History, and Reason In the Greek heritage of the West, myth or mythos has always been in tension with reason or logos, which signified the sensible and analytic mode of arriving at a true account of reality. The Greek philosophers Xenophanes, Plato, and Aristotle, for example, exalted reason and made sarcastic criticisms of myth as a proper way of knowing reality. The distinctions between reason and myth and between myth and history, although essential, were never quite absolute. Aristotle concluded that in some of the early Greek creation myths, logos and mythos overlapped. Plato used myths as metaphors and also as literary devices in developing an argument. Western Mythical Traditions The debate over whether myth, reason, or history best expresses the meaning of the reality of the gods, humans, and nature has continued in Western culture as a legacy from its earliest traditions. Among these traditions were the myths of the Greeks. Adopted and assimilated by the Romans, they furnished literary, philosophical, and artistic inspiration to such later periods as the Renaissance and the romantic era. The pagan tribes of Europe furnished another body of tradition.

Liberalism and Mercantilism Essay

International political economy is an important subdiscipline of international relation. It has three main ideologies, Liberalism, Mercantilism and Marxism. In this essay there will be three parts, first part is to demonstrate what the Liberalism and Mercantilism are on the perspective of international political economy and then the second part is to compare and contrast these two ideologies of political economy. At last, give a conclusion to the Liberalism and Mercantilism. Liberalism The liberal perspective on political economy is embodied in the discipline of the Western economics (Gilpin, 1987). It emphasizes the individual interests, the freedom and the maximization of economic benefit. Economic liberalism is based on the theory of â€Å"invisible hand† of Adam Smith and founded by David Ricardo in the seventeenth century. In the 1940s, Friedrich August von Hayek made a renaissance and a new explanation to it. Moreover, Milton Friedman made great contribution to the economic Liberalism in the 1970s. The basic standpoints of economic Liberalism are that people should be treated as the â€Å"rational economic animal† and market emerges spontaneously to satisfy human need. When the market running it develops according to its internal logical rule, rather than people’s will. Even through economic activity can enhance national power, the core of it is to bring beneficial to each consumer. Due to each person are both consumer and producer, so ev ery action of each person should be a rational choice in the market. Because resources are scarce, every decision involves an opportunity cost, a tradeoff among alternative uses of available resource (Samuelson, 1980, p.27). Get something at the cost of giving up something else. Hence everyone’s rational choices contribute to a balance among various powers in the market. The balance of these various powers makes the market have its intrinsic stability. That means the market is not only an automatic operation system, but also an autocorrection equilibrium system. Any intervention, especially from the government, is helpless to market development and destroys the intrinsic stability of market. Therefore, economic Liberalism opposes any form of government intervention strongly. Economic liberals claim that politics makes people separation while economy  makes people solidarity. A liberal international economy will have a moderation influence on international politics as it creates bonds of mutual interests and a commitment to the status quo. (Gilpin, 1987) Mercantilism According to Viner (1994), Mercantilism is a theory that state uses its economic interests widespreadly to regulate its economic activities. It emphasizes economic activities should serve for the interests of state and goal of state building (Gilpin, 1975). There are three theoretical points of Mercantilism (Magnusson, 1993). Firstly, Mercantilism pays attention to the currency and development of commerce. It regards the amount of currency (mainly gold and silver) as an important symbol to measure the degree of state’s affluence. Secondly, Mercantilism pays attention to foreign trade and seeks for trade surplus. It has no faith in market mechanism for state building. Thirdly, Mercantilism pays attention to the development of domestic industry, at the same time cultivates and protects the infant industry. According to Sen (1984), Mercantilism believes that industry has spillover effects and it associates the possession of industry with economic self-sufficiency and political autonomy. The most important, industry is prized because it is basic of military power and central to national security in the modern world. Actually, Mercantilism can be divided into two parts, â€Å"benign† Mercantilism and â€Å"malevolent† Mercantilism. The â€Å"benign† Mercantilism considers the safeguarding of national economic interests as the minimum essential to the security and survival of the state. It hopes to develop and protect domestic industry with the state power (like tariff, exchange rate, etc) and to prevent foreign product competition, for example, monetary policy. While â€Å"malevolent† Mercantilism advocates to build a powerful state and to ensure foreign trade unblocked with using of state power and regards the international economy as an arena for imperialist expansion (Hirschman, 1969). Even through there are differences between these two Mercantilisms, the goal of Mercantilism that makes state rich and powerful is clear and unified. (Magnusson, 1987) Compare and contrast of Liberalism and Mercantilism. The debate between Liberalism and Mercantilism has a long history. There are  three main differences between these two ideologies of political economy according to Goddard (2003). Firstly, Liberalism focuses on the market mechanism and believes that the economic role of government is limited. However, Mercantilism pays attention to the role of state and considers politics decide the economic activity. Secondly, Mercantilism regards world economy as a zero-sum game which means one country’s loss is as the prerequisite to another country’s gain. Moreover, Mercantilism thinks conflict between different countries is inevitable. Each country can only rely on its own resources to protect itself eventually. However, Liberalism opposes the zero-sum game. It believes the only consequence of the zero-sum game is war. Liberalism stresses the mutual benefit and a win-win situation which lead to international cooperation and interedependency. That is, dividing an existing cake is inferior to make a bigger cake (By promoting economy growth). Finally, Mercantilism focuses on the importance of military power and regards political and economic power as a way to ensure the security of state. Liberalism thinks accumulation of military power and other powers reduces the economic efficiency. Peace is more effective than war. The following table coming from Frederic shows the specific difference between Liberalism and Mercantilism (1999). Conclusion Even through the most of viewpoints of Liberalism and Mercantilism are different, these two ideologies of political economy have the value of existence respectively and are worth to research. In addition, Liberalism and Mercantilism have their own advantage and disadvantage. When begin to research them, people should have a critique view to accept their viewpoints. In summary, Liberalism and Mercantilism are two important ideologies of political economy Reference 1. Frederic S. Pearson and Simon Payaslian. International Political Economy: Conflict and Cooperation in the Global System. The Mcgraw-Hill Companies, 1999, P.33 2. Gilpin, Robert. 1975 U.S Power and the Multionational Corporation: The Political Economy of Foreign Direct Investment. New York: Basic Books 3. Gilpin, Robert 1987. The Political Economy of International Relations. Oxford: Princeton University Press. Chapters 2 P.33-P.79 4. Goddard, C. Roe; Cronin, Patrick and Dash, Kishore C. (eds.) (2003). International Political Economy: State-Market Relations in a Changing Global Order. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers (chapters 2-4, 6, 11-13). 5. Hirschman Albert.O 1969 â€Å"Effects of Industrialization on the Market of Industrial Countries† In bert F. Hoselitz, cd. The Progress of Underdeveloped Areas. Chicago: University of Chicago press. pp. 83-270. 6. Magnusson Lars. 1987. â€Å"Mercantilism and Reform-mercantilism: The Rise of Economic Discourse in Sweden During the Eighteenth Century† History of Political Economy 19: 3. 7. Magnusson Lars. 1993. Mercantilism. The Shaping of Economic Language. London: Routledge 8. Samuelson Paul A. 1980. Economics. With the Assistance in Statistical Updating of William Samuelson. New York: Mcgraw-Hill. 9. Sen, Gautam. 1984 The Military Origins of Industrialization and International Trade Rivalry. New York: St. Martin’s Press 10. Viner, Jacob. 1994. Power versus plenty as objectives of foreign policy in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, World Politics, No.1 p.11

South Africa Is Our Only Real Mother

The hand that rocks the cradle, Is the hand that rules the world. These are the wise words of William Wallace. I agree with him: A mother knows how to educate her children. For us South Africa is our only real mother. Plinks said: People undertake great Journeys to faraway places to see things that they don't appreciate in their own country. Our Mother South Africa cares about us, and therefore she takes us to her Art Museum filled with all her beautiful treasures of nature. Table Mountain with its cloudy table-cloth, is the beacon where a new nation was born.Then she takes us on the Garden Route through Cornerstones with its bonbons and protease. According to the description of the poet Liana Spies, Unequalled is the place where God's seed sachet was leaking†¦ When Spring starts, the earth is covered with thousands of colored flowers that take your breath away! From there she takes you on a game drive to the big five. Nowhere else in the world will you find this unique variety of wild life: Lions, Elephants, Rhino, Buffalo's and Leopards. It is the dream of every hunter to have a trophy of one of these animals as part of his hunting collection- Says PeterWeakened in the magazine â€Å"Go† of Cot 08. A mother definitely spoils her child. South Africa has many resources. If you open the tap, the water is running. If you drive into the countryside, you see the crop fields, vineyards, fruit orchards, vegetable farms and plantations that provide food and oxygen to Mother Africans children. If you walk out the door and see children play, you realize that that is a privilege – Says Urdu van Wok in ROI Rose of July 08. Oversees cluster houses with no garden at all, are the normal way of living. So, appreciate the open blue, African Sky!Ecologist Sydney Wright said: The earth is our playground. Mother South Africa nurtures us. We are all caught up in the rat race against time. We run around like mad dogs, being uptight and stiff-lipped. Then Mother S outh Africa puts her arms around us and takes us on a trip to the beach where we can revivalist our souls. It doesn't matter what we enjoy most: The fresh sea breeze, the deep blue ocean, the hot white sand, or the hot brown bodies†¦.! South Africans are known as the sun-seekers of the world. And when the sun sets, we turn to the company of a barbecue with friends and loved ones. Amp steak and the call of the hyena†¦ No wonder the English Pompoms me. Y us and try to copy-cat our â€Å"brainless. † I call their poor excuse for meat on a TV-briar, a â€Å"Barbie†! Ladies and gentlemen†¦ According to National Geographic, South Africa has 5 of the world's top rated nature reserves. We are lucky that Mother South Africa cuddles us with her beautiful scenery. She spoils us by keeping our food stores full, And provides us with exotic places to relax and revivalist. Mother South Africa is a country that provides us with what the Afrikaans poet – C Louis L eopold – describes as: â€Å"Summer, sun and sapphire for me!!

Writing Academic Papers

How do you feel about writing academic papers? If you have enjoyed writing in the past, what did you like about the process of writing? If you have not enjoyed it, why not? Did you have any of the misconceptions about writing discussed in Chapter 1 of the text? What did you learn in the chapter that you think might be helpful to you in writing papers here at Ashford University? I do not like writing academic papers. It is very time consuming and some require doing a lot of research on the topic.I don’t like write papers because the subject is not of interest to me sometimes. I also find it a little difficult to do a thesis statement. In reading Chapter 1, â€Å"many writing experts suggest keeping a personal journal or a diary to help you understand what you have read and to sharpen your writing skills† (Sole, 2010). I’m going to start journaling at least twice a week to help improve my writing skills. Sole, K. (2010). Essentials for College Writing. San Diego, B ridgepoint Education, Inc. ttps://content. ashford. edu After studying the active reading strategies in Chapter 2 of the text, read Chapters 1 and 2 and your Instructor’s Guidance for Week One again, applying the SQ3R strategy as you reread the materials. Discuss how this reading strategy is similar or different from the way you read the material previously. Do you think this strategy improved your comprehension of the course materials? Discuss whether the strategy will or will not be helpful to you in your college courses?SQ3R stands for Survey, Question, Read, Recite, and Review. â€Å"Survey means to skim headings, subheadings, chapter summary, charts, and tables in text; Question the headings and subheadings into questions; Read to find the answers to your questions and record the answers by highlighting, underlining, or taking notes; Recite and summarize what you learned by telling someone else or writing it down; and Review by going back and reading your notes or infor mation that you highlighted or underlined to einforce learning and to commit the information to memory† (Sole, 2010). After reading Chapters 1, 2, and the Instructor’s Guidance for the second time and applying the SQ3R process, I can say that I follow this guideline as I’m doing school work. I think it is a good and helpful strategy to follow and will improve how you comprehend whatever you’ve read. Sole, K. (2010). Essentials for College Writing. San Diego, Bridgepoint Education, Inc. https://content. ashford. edu

Eddie plays Essay

The third of these parts is an actual character in the play. Alfieri plays a lawyer that Eddie goes to for advice. Alfieri works in a poor community and only deals with small neighbourhood affairs. ‘Morally and Legally you have no right, you cannot stop it’ is a piece of advice Eddie receives from Alfieri, he ignores the advice and chooses to deal with it his own way by breaking the neighbourhood code of honour. Alfieri as a character feels he can no longer change Eddie’s mind and feels rather powerless at this time. The last part Eddie plays is the epilogue. This is the small speech Alfieri says at the end of the play which is rather like a eulogy. A eulogy is a speech made at a funeral. It usually outlines the good points about the deceased person. When the play is portrayed on stage, Alfieri has a very important part to play as the epilogue. The speech has to look effective, the lights dim down and Alfieri talks to the audience. This speech is aimed at the audience and ends the play on a serious note.. The epilogue takes an effect on the on the audience as there are women ‘keening’ on the stage in other words crying on there knees. This has strong effect on the audience while Alfieri’s reading the epilogue. This is seen as reflective time following the sudden violent action of Eddie’s death. Alfieri try’s to say good things about Eddie. He describes him ‘ I think I will love him more than all my sensible clients’ the epilogues message is saying something nice about Eddie. Alfieri is saying Eddie’s case is very different to the rest of his cases he has dealt with . Eddie added excitement to Alfieri’s normally dull lifestyle and Alfieri will miss that. By the saying ‘settle for half’ Alfieri means the audience would probably settle for compromise. In ‘ A View from the Bridge’ Eddie is see as the hero, unfortunately every tragic hero has a weakness and for Eddie his tragic Weakness is his desire for Catherine his Niece. Eddie finally realises he can’t have her When Beatrice tells him in the final scene. She begins telling Eddie she loves him, when he doesn’t respond she tells him ‘you want somethin’ else Eddie and you can never have her! ‘ The actress wouldn’t be angry while delivering the phrase but she wouldn’t be happy either. To face up to their partner loving someone else is very hard, especially telling them you know and finding out it’s your niece. Catherine and Eddie react in horror to what they have just heard and Eddie continues to deny it. Eddie is so full of horror at hearing this speech because he knows his secret is out, it’s also the shock of someone saying you fancy your niece. This gets translated into anger against Marco because Eddie has been getting more and more annoyed and when Beatrice tells him he sees Marco’s challenge outside as a means of physically venting his anger, pain and frustration. The revelation to himself of his desires for Catherine would be tearing his mind apart so the audience would see a an virtually insane. As in a Greek tragedy Marco is seen as Eddie’s inevitable doom, Eddie cannot escape death. There have been many failed attempts to prevent the final tragedy, these have been made by Alfieri, Catherine, Beatrice and even Rodolpho. Rodolpho tries to stop Eddie by saying ‘No he has children, you will destroy a family’ But this still doesn’t stop Eddie fighting with Marco. As soon as Eddie finds out about Rodolpho and Catherine he is on the path to destruction. This is shown in the final meeting Eddie has with Alfieri, also when he returns home drunk to find Rodolpho and Catherine have probably had sex. In the play Eddie has a high demand for respect this can often affect other characters in the play as Eddie reels them in and gets them involved. At the start of the final scene Eddie tells Beatrice that if she attends the wedding she can’t come back to their house. When Eddie tells Beatrice she can’t return to his house the audience would be quite surprised. Beatrice having to miss out on her niece’s wedding just because Eddie doesn’t want to lose his pride. The audience would be telling Beatrice just to go to the wedding but she doesn’t want to lose Eddie. Eddie feels that Catherine owes him respect because he took her in after her mother and father died and he also paid for her stenograph lessons so she could get a well paid job. Catherine then enters from the bedroom and seems as if she didn’t hear Beatrice and Eddie’s conversation. She ask’s Beatrice if she’s ready as the wedding starts at three and the ‘priest won’t wait’. When Eddie asks Beatrice whose side she’s on, Catherine reacts differently to her whole attitude throughout the play. She suddenly shouts ‘Who the hell do you think you are? ‘ this makes an impression on Beatrice and Eddie. Moreover, the audience have not heard her speak like this before. Beatrice tells Catherine to ‘sssh’ but Catherine doesn’t listen and continues to insult Eddie. This is quite shocking to the audience because at any moment Eddie could hurt Catherine as the audience know what he’s capable of and can see the anger in his eyes. As Catherine continues Beatrice also tells Catherine to shut up but she doesn’t listen. Beatrice ignores Catherine when she tells her to come this is when she calls Eddie a rat. ‘He bites people when they sleep! He comes when nobody’s lookin’ and poisons decent people. In the garbage he belongs’. Catherine refers to Eddie as a sewage rat because he is under the ground and lower than anyone else. Catherine feels Eddie belongs in the garbage. Also Miller is using a pun. The American colloquialism ‘to rat’ on somebody is the same as the English ‘grass’ somebody up which is wha ople had for Eddie. By telling what Eddie had done, Marco took away the respect Eddie had, therefore he stole his name-which is referred to as a mark of respect. When Eddie addresses the people about Marco stealing his respect he talks about all he has done for Marco and Rodolpho. He explains how he took them in and how he’d never even seen them before. He makes vague references to the bible and feels he offered them sanctuary from the world outside and the law. ‘ Little bits of laughter even escape him as his eyes are murderous’. This is a sentence from the stage directions when Eddie is saying his speech to the neighbourhood. This is the first part which shows Eddie is becoming virtually insane with anger. His anger is continually boiling up over the whole play and the argument with Marco is a time when he can let it all out and it adds to the excitement of the argument. The way Eddie speaks makes him seem to be going virtually insane. He makes the argument out as if it’s all Marco’s fault and even seems to forget about Rodolpho a and Catherine. In his speech Eddie starts it off with a series of rhetorical questions and it doesn’t matter because Eddie doesn’t give Marco time to answer. Miller makes Eddie say the speech because Eddie’s anger has had a dramatic effect on the audience. The speech is very similar to other tragedies. Eddie’s address is like an aria in an opera, full of passion which here is making Eddie almost incoherent. Eddie gives Marco an option, if he gives him his name back they can go peacefully to the wedding. Of course Marco declines. When Eddie makes the offer to Marco, He makes it in the street in front of everyone. He feels Marco has done wrong and he continues to deny telling the immigration bureau. Eddie just wants Marco to tell the neighbourhood he was lying then everything will be ok. However, Eddie’s tone of contempt would grate in the audience. The public confrontation that Eddie and Marco have is typical of western cowboy films. This relates to Millers opinion that the Brooklyn waterfront was like the ‘wild west’. The participants usually walk 10 paces then face each other and fight like a duel. Cowboy films were very popular in the 1950’s with actors like Alan Ladd, Gregory Peck and John Wayne.. The idea of a western confrontation comes from the phrase ‘A man’s gotta’ do what a mans gotta’ do’. Arthur Miller once said the waterfront in the 1950’s that it was ‘the wild west, a desert beyond the law’. The confrontation Eddie and Marco have is based on the idea of a man has to stand up for what he believes in and Eddie is doing that by asking for his name back but Marco was also doing that because he believed he should have told the neighbourhood what Eddie had done. The duel between Eddie and Marco is very much like that in a typical Wild West film. Like gunfighters approaching each other down the high street, Eddie and Marco are approaching each other across the stage. Each as in a typical western duel challenges the other. Eddie says ‘ Marco, tell them what a liar you are! Both actors have their arms outspread similar to the gun fighter’s hands hovering above their hoisted guns. Like in a cowboy duel Eddie makes the first move ‘lunging’ for Marco. As in a western the spectators gasp in surprise however Marco’s superior strength strikes Eddie to the ground. Marco calls Eddie ‘Animal! ‘ showing that Eddie can no longer consider himself human. This is similar to Catherine earlier calling him a rat. Marco also shouts ‘ Get on your knees to me’ this is the dramatic way Marco demands respect. Miller emphasises Marco’s rage by use of exclamation marks. However Eddie breaks the rules of the duel by producing a knife causing Marco to step back. When the audience see Eddie go down they would probably be shocked because although the story is like a Greek tragedy the audience might not have known that. When Eddie goes down the audience would be happy Eddie can cause no more damage but as the hero the audience will have become rather attached to him. When Eddie produces the knife they would be surprised but anxious at the same time. They know that either Eddie or Marco is going to die, the way the actors portray the fight would affect the way the audience felt. The knife ‘ups’ the stakes and makes a violent death even more of a possibility. When Eddie and Marco begin to fight, Louis try’s to intervene and stop them ‘ for Christ’s sake! ‘ When Louis says this Eddie raises the knife and appears as if he’s going to strike as Louis has seen the way Eddie is acting he believes he will do it and steps back, leaving Eddie and Marco to face each other. Miller makes Louis intervene as a sort of last resort to stop the fight. His wife, his niece and his wife’s cousins have all attempted to stop the fight happening and each of them have failed. Miller feels that a friend can usually stop you doing something that isn’t right. Unfortunately Eddie made a big mistake using a knife because this fight is becoming his last. Marco intentionally turns the blade inwards and forces Eddie to stab himself. This ties in with the idea of a Greek tragedy. The hero facing his inevitable doom. From the beginning of the play Marco was seen as Eddie’s inevitable doom. ‘ A View from the Bridge’ is similar to other tragedies where the hero meets his inevitable doom. ‘Macbeth’ written by William Shakespeare arised from the idea of a Greek tragedy. The main character mentioned in the title, meets his inevitable doom at the end of the play. Another play written by Shakespeare, Romeo and Juliet also arises from a Greek tragedy when two of the main characters meet their doom. I was quite shocked when I heard the end of the play. Even though I knew it was a Greek tragedy I didn’t expect Eddie to die. From the way Miller describes Marco’s appearance I could tell he would probably cause some trouble. When Marco picked the chair up over Eddie you could tell Marco wasn’t afraid of confrontation if necessary. I think that the message Miller was trying to get across is that fighting isn’t the answer and that whatever happens was meant to happen, it’s your fate. At the end when Alfieri says the epilogue I think Miller means we can come to a compromise and if they can’t then walk away, or else we to will have to face the same consequences as Eddie Carbone.

Recent Direction of Monetary Policy in a Country of Your Choice Essay

Recent Direction of Monetary Policy in a Country of Your Choice - Essay Example Presently, the Reserve Bank executes the functions of the monetary policies in the USA for the purpose of controlling significant issues such as inflation, unemployment, and investment trends among others (Mankiw, 1997). Notably, there lie several purposes of the monetary policies that have been transformed periodically. The various guidelines of the government of a particular country possessed a noteworthy role in the economy in which the central bank acts for the purpose of executing the monetary or fiscal policies to a large extent. The chief motives of executing the monetary policies are to enhance the progression as well as the advancement of a country, decreasing the rate of unemployment and maintaining stable prices of different commodities (Reserve Bank of New Zealand, 2007). Monetary or fiscal policies are often related with certain important factors including the facilities of credit and the rate of interests among others. It can be stated that the monetary guiding principl es establish a kind of interrelation amid the rate of the interest charges which indicates toward the price or charge at which money can be borrowed and also toward the overall money supply in an economy (Taylor, 2001). In this paper, a brief idea regarding the conception of monetary policy along with its recent direction prevailing in an economy is taken into concern. In this regards, this paper will focus on presenting a brief overview of monetary policies prevailing in USA specifying its recent direction. A Brief Overview of Monetary Policies in USA Monetary policy of any nation is defined as the management of money supply and interest charges that are executed by the central banks of various countries to control the rising commodity prices as well as to diminish the rate of unemployment to a certain extent. From an in-depth point of view, it can be inferred that the monetary policies have a considerable impact upon the demand in an economy which in turn tend to affect the rate o f interest charges (Patnaik, 2007). It is in this context that the substantial increase in the rate of interests makes the finance lending abilities of an individual more costly where the organizations as well as the firms hold fewer inventories. Moreover, a rise in the interest charges also influences the investment initiatives of an individual as well as of any industry participant to be more costly. Subsequently, the assets tend to lose its real value (Floyd, 2010). Furthermore, in relation to the financial reforms considered in the USA, the role and the importance of the monetary policies have posed greater attention as a major economic growth driver. Notably, the adequate functioning of the monetary policies is to sustain a stable and low inflation rate in the economy. The significances as well as the purposes of the monetary policies have increasingly become the prime importance of the policy makers in the USA for the purpose of introducing certain policies that would support to maintain a stable and low inflation rate (Friedman, 1968). The broad aims or targets of the monetary policies are to attain rapid rate of financial progression and advancement of the economy, making sure to preserve the stability of price into the economy. It also aims at generating more employment prospects and promoting distributive integrity towards the economy (Rangarajan, 1997). The issue of stability of prices, a low and a steady price situation among others are also fundamentally regarded as a necessary element for the purpose of enhancing as well as raising the productivity and growth of an economy (Rangarajan, 1997). Moreover, the other purposes of the monetary policies include stabilizing the rate of inter